Happy 911 Everybody ! - The Mass Ritual Celebration ?

The Events of September 11th 2001 have become the most polarizing events in the history of mankind. The same entities who were responsible for these events are also responsible for the endless debate about it.

This debate is used to capture and divide the energy of the world to be redirected into the agenda which serves these same entities.

A Quick Review of these Events

What About WTC building 7


Everything you wanted to know about WTC building 7, but were afraid to ask

EXPLOSIONS ?




Why Should You Care ?


Ok Wackos aside what are engineers saying about this ?


Ok back to the Wackos


The 9/11 attacks led to the death of 2,973 victims and 19 hijackers. It also injured over 6000 people. A lot of deaths and injuries were because there was too much dust sucked in and caused lung diseases. About another 350 people died in car crashes while avoiding commercial airline travel

Now to put this tragedy in perspective you may want to consider that on an average day in the US about a 155,000 die. There are about 307,000,000 people in the US and about 7 billion in the world.

911 Masturbation ok ?


Why would a group of global elite want to create an event that would polarize the masses ? Most likely to distract the masses from an event that will affect more than the the events of September 11th 2001

How The World Has Changed since September 11th 2001

Global financial collapse ?

911 was a mass trauma based ritual designed to capture the worlds imagination and redirect that energy toward maintaining the illusion of the physical world
There is no specific agenda(eg war, oil, population control) but rather to create a template for physical reality. Its like when you were a kid and you made up a game and everybody who wanted to play had to play by your rules. The winners and losers change but everyone must play the game. When you play a game you must first choose to play, then you play. Mass rituals create the illusion that you must play their game because it is the only game. They need you to play their game to power their game
The more people who play the more powerful the game becomes. There is a reason the MMORPG are the most abundant users of bandwith resources on the web...now imagine you are your own avatar in a MMORPG called physical reality


- All Rights Reserved 2010 - The Niles Lesh Project Follow NILES LESH / MIENFOKS on TWITTER !

Kangaroo farts could ease global warming

Kangaroo farts could ease global warming

December 06, 2007 11:56am
Article from: Agence France-Presse

AUSTRALIAN scientists are trying to give kangaroo-style stomachs to cattle and sheep in a bid to cut the emission of greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, researchers say.

Thanks to special bacteria in their stomachs, kangaroo flatulence contains no methane and scientists want to transfer that bacteria to cattle and sheep who emit large quantities of the harmful gas.

While the usual image of greenhouse gas pollution is a billowing smokestack pushing out carbon dioxide, livestock passing wind contribute a surprisingly high percentage of total emissions in some countries.

"Fourteen per cent of emissions from all sources in Australia is from enteric methane from cattle and sheep,'' said Athol Klieve, a senior research scientist with the Queensland Government.

"And if you look at another country such as New Zealand, which has got a much higher agricultural base, they're actually up around 50 per cent,'' he said.

Researchers say the bacteria also makes the digestive process much more efficient and could potentially save millions of dollars in feed costs for farmers.

"Not only would they not produce the methane, they would actually get something like 10 to 15 per cent more energy out of the feed they are eating,'' said Mr Klieve.

Even farmers who laugh at the idea of environmentally friendly kangaroo farts say that's nothing to joke about, particularly given the devastating drought Australia is suffering.

"In a tight year like a drought situation, 15 per cent would be a considerable sum,'' said farmer Michael Mitton.

But it will take researchers at least three years to isolate the bacteria, before they can even start to develop a way of transferring it to cattle and sheep.

Another group of scientists, meanwhile, has suggested Australians should farm fewer cattle and sheep and just eat more kangaroos.

The idea is controversial, but about 20 per cent of health-conscious Australians are believed to eat the national symbol already.

"It's low in fat, it's got high protein levels it's very clean in the sense that basically it's the ultimate free range animal,'' said Peter Ampt of the University of New South Wales's institute of environmental studies.

"It doesn't get drenched, it doesn't get vaccinated, it utilises food right across the landscape, it moves around to where the food is good, so yes, it's a good food.''

It might take a while for kangaroos to become popular barbecue fare, but with concern over global warming growing in the world's driest inhabited continent, Australians could soon be ready to try almost anything to cut emissions.

SOLVING GLOBAL WARMING WITH PEE ???

Proposal to fix Pacific with 'urea' dump

By Charles Clover,


Proposals to dump large quantities of nitrogen-rich chemical in the Pacific as a quick fix for climate change have emerged at a UN treaty meeting in London.

An Australian company is planning to dump 500 tons of urea into the sea between Philippines and Borneo
An Australian company is planning to dump 500 tons of urea into the sea between Philippines and Borneo

Governments meeting to discuss whether the oceans should be used for experiments aimed at "fixing" carbon from the atmosphere heard that an Australian company is planning to dump 500 tons of industrially-produced urea - a substance that naturally occurs in urine - into the sea between Philippines and Borneo.

The meeting of members of the London Convention, the UN treaty on dumping at sea, heard that Ocean Nourishment Corporation of Sydney was in discussion with the Philippines government to pump nitrogen-rich water into the sea to stimulate algal blooms.

The idea is to pump the urea into barren areas of the ocean on the edge of the continental shelf to stimulate the growth of plant plankton.

Phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide from sea water. Fish eat them and when they die some fall to the bottom, potentially removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
advertisement

Ian Jones, chief executive of the Ocean Nourishment Corporation, has been quoted as saying: "We transform the land to provide food for people. This is like practising agriculture at sea."

His company intends to use its technology to claim carbon credits under the Kyoto climate treaty.

John Ridley, managing director of the Ocean Nourishment Corporation, said: "An environmental assessment whether required for this small scale of experiment or not, is being prepared as this is part of our company environmental practice.

"While ocean nourishment will stimulate algal growth it is not intended to cause algal blooms. In fact the intention is to control the nutrient concentrations at one tenth to one fifth of levels that would result in an algal boom.

"In terms of a moratorium on research and development into climate change solutions - I think this would be unwise.

"In terms of terminology "dumping" is not a term that describes our nutrient injection - in the same way that a farmer doesn't dump fertilizer on his crops. Dumping tends to imply a waste product whereas this form of nitrogen is a valuable commodity."

The proposed release of urea follows controversy over plans by Planktos, a San Francisco-based company to dump thousands of tons of iron in the Pacific off the Galapagos Islands in an experiment also designed to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

A coalition of environmental groups are calling for the London Convention to call a moratorium on large "geo-engineering" projects until there has been an assessment of their environmental impacts.

David Santillo, Greenpeace representative on the London Convention, said: "This ill founded scheme is hitting the news because the Philippine bureau of fisheries is preparing to issue a permit. There would probably be an algal bloom but the vague assumption that carbon would be locked away forever is nonsense.

"Our view is that if the London Convention doesn't stop this, we wonder who will."

A spokesman for the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: "The recent report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that geo-engineering solutions to climate change remain largely unproven and are potentially high risk.

"The UK Government's strategy is that the most sustainable, low risk and effective solution to climate change is to tackle the problem at its source through substantially reducing greenhouse gas emissions."